Anti-AI-Slop Patterns (Core)
These are the critical patterns that get caught in every piece of content. The full 29-pattern detection system lives in ai-pattern-detection.md (this collection) as a standalone skill for deep scans.
Always Catch (Critical)
-
Em-dashes (---): Delete all. Use periods, commas, or restructure. You use ellipses (...) and arrows (-->) naturally instead.
-
Authority Signaling Phrases: "The uncomfortable truth", "Let me be clear", "Here's what nobody tells you", "The hard truth is", "Here's the reality", "What most people miss is..."
- Exception: "here's how" and "here's the play" are directional in your voice, not performative. Those are fine.
-
Narrator Setup Lines: "Here's the thing about...", "here's where it gets interesting..." Delete the setup. Start with the actual point.
-
Dramatic Rhetorical Framing: "But here's the part where...", "And that's when it clicked.", "Want to know the crazy part?" State what happened. Let the reader feel it.
-
Three Parallel Dramatic Sentences: "You can't see it. You can't copy-paste it away. You have to know it exists." One direct statement lands harder. Cut to one.
-
The Bookend Summary: Opening with a thesis, closing with the exact same thesis rephrased 800 words later. AI wraps content in neat bows. Real thinking goes somewhere new by the end.
-
Self-Branded Concepts: "This is what I call..." Just explain it.
-
Artificial Drama Sentences: "The shift sounds simple. It's not." Show why it's hard with a specific example.
-
Colon-Listed Everything: "the result: better data. the impact: faster sales." Reads like a PowerPoint slide. Write natural sentences.
-
The Humble Brag Disclaimer: "I don't have all the answers, but..." Share your take or don't. The disclaimer makes it worse.
-
Hype Words: "game changer", "chaos", "unleash", "supercharge", "next-level". Lazy energy words that say nothing. Replace with what actually changed or happened.
-
"No fluff" / "No BS" Disclaimers: Saying "no fluff" is itself fluff. If the content has no fluff, the reader will know. Delete the disclaimer.
-
"Nada" Filler: "Nada this, nada that." Performative emphasis that reads as AI padding. Cut it.
Context-Dependent (Check but don't auto-delete)
-
Engagement Bait Endings: "So here's my question for you..." Generally avoid, BUT on meme posts you do ask "what's your version? drop it in the comments" and that fits the lighter tone.
-
Bullets for Arguments: Arguments belong in prose. BUT workflow steps, tool lists, and technical implementations use bullets/emoji markers naturally. The rule: bullets for execution, prose for reasoning.
-
False Dichotomies: "It's not X, it's Y." Generally avoid, BUT you naturally contrast old way vs. new way (manual SDR grind vs. automated Clay workflow). That's not a false dichotomy, that's showing evolution.
-
Bold Headers as Transitions: Headers for navigation only. Your posts don't typically use headers anyway. LinkedIn formatting is whitespace-driven.
Your Natural Patterns (Not Slop)
These look like AI tells but are actually your voice. Don't flag them:
- Ellipses (...) for trailing thoughts: "true story. 😅", "it feels... prehistoric"
- Arrows (-->, ➡️) for workflow steps and progression
- Emoji section markers (✅, 🔧, 🔗, 🧠, 🕷️) for structuring workflow walkthroughs
- "here's how" / "here's the play" as directional openers into workflow breakdowns
- Pop culture references mixed into technical content
- "no gatekeeping" as a value statement with resource delivery in comments